Logo Kadin Indonesia

KADIN INDONESIA

Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

KADIN INDONESIA

Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

KPPU Grants Flexibility for Respondents in Partnership Cases

The Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha – “KPPU”) has established a new framework that governs procedures for the supervision and handling of cases related to alleged violations that occur during the implementation of partnerships through the issuance of Regulation of the KPPU No. 2 of 2024 on Procedures for the Supervision and Handling of Partnership Cases (“Regulation 2/2024”), which has been in force since 5 April 2024.[1] Consequent to the enforcement of Regulation 2/2024, the previous framework to address the supervision and handling of partnership cases, specifically Regulation of the KPPU No. 4 of 2019, which bore a similar title to Regulation 2/2024 (“Regulation 4/2019”), has now been simultaneously repealed and replaced.[2]

As background,  Regulation 2/2024 sets out the scope of KPPU supervision of partnerships, specifically: 1) Micro-scale enterprises and medium-scale enterprises; 2) Micro-scale enterprises and large-scale enterprises; 3) Small-scale enterprises and medium-scale enterprises; 4) Small-scale enterprises and large-scale enterprises; and 5) Medium-scale enterprises and large-scale enterprises. Partnerships can be implemented through 10 types of models that include: franchises, distributors, agencies, joint ventures, outsourcing and so forth (for more information, see “KPPU Strengthens Handling of Partnership Cases”).[3] Due to the wide scope of Regulation 2/2024, this edition of Indonesian Legal Brief will highlight various new provisions introduced therein and will focus its discussion on the following related topics:

  1. Legal Representation and the Merged Handling of Alleged Violations;
  2. Types of Cases: Revised Required Contents of Reports; and
  3. Highlighting Updated Provisions on Handling Procedures.

 

Legal Representation and the Merged Handling of Alleged Violations

Regulation 2/2024 has now expanded provisions that address legal representatives, including the following arrangements:[4]

  1. Witnesses, informants (pelapor) and/or respondents (terlapor) may be assisted or represented by legal representatives, who must secure special power of attorney from said parties during each stage of the supervision and handling of partnership cases. Legal representatives may also provide advice to the above-mentioned parties regarding requests for statements (permintaan keterangan);
  2. If legal representatives are advocates, then they must provide and submit original power of attorney (surat kuasa asli) along with their identities.
  3. The handling of cases may be merged (through requests that are submitted by relevant officials responsible for the supervision of partnerships and that require approvals to be granted at KPPU meetings) under the following conditions:
    • More than one report addresses the same specific matters; and/or
    • There are links between different alleged violations.

 

Regulation 4/2019 stated that only respondents had the right to be assisted by legal representatives.[5]

 

Types of Cases: Revised Required Contents of Reports

Similar to Regulation 4/2019, cases can be opened through the filing of reports, as well as on the initiative of the KPPU. A definition of reports has also now been introduced under Regulation 2/2024 and breaks down as follows: “Information through complete and clear explanations regarding allegations of ownership and/or control by large-scale or medium-scale enterprises is submitted to the KPPU by informants.[6]

Furthermore, Regulation 2/2024 specifies that informants may  file reports on alleged violations (“Reports”) with the Chief of the KPPU directly (i.e. through KPPU headquarters or regional branches) or through electronic media. Moreover, it should be noted that once Reports have been submitted, they cannot be revoked by informants.[7]

The minimum contents of Reports have also been updated from those previously set under Regulation 4/2019, as summarized in the following table:

Required contents Regulation 2/2024[8] Regulation 4/2019[9]
Informant’s identity
Respondents’s identity
Informant’s partner’s identity
Partnership pattern and partnership object
Clear description of alleged violations of the law, such as allegations pertaining to ownership and/or control
Evidence of the alleged violations
Informant’s signature

 

Highlighting Updated Provisions on Handling Procedures

Regulation 2/2024 has also revised the overall handling process,  which now breaks down into the following stages: 1) Investigation; 2) Preliminary examination; 3) Written warnings; 4) Advanced examination; and 5) KPPU decision.[10] The following table  summarizes these related activities and the timeframes that apply to each stage, as provided under the frameworks of both Regulation 2/2024 and Regulation 4/2019:

Stage Regulation 2/2024 Regulation 4/2019
Investigation
  • This stage, amongst other elements, encompasses the summoning of witnesses, experts and/or respondents.[11]
  • Maximum of 60 business days, which can be extended by up to a maximum of 30 days per extension[12]
Not available
Preliminary examination
  • This stage, amongst other elements, encompasses: 1) The submission of reports to respondents; and 2) The submission of responses by respondents (within a maximum of 30 business days after Reports are received).[13]
  • This stage previously comprised two phases (Phases 1 and 2). Phase 1 encompassed activities that are now referred to as an “investigation” under Regulation 2/2024, while Phase II encompassed activities that are now referred to as “preliminary examination” under Regulation 2/2024. [14]
  • The respondents were given a maximum of 14 business days after receiving Reports in which to submit their responses.[15]
Written warnings
  • The KPPU may decide to issue written warnings based on Reports, investigations and preliminary examinations. Said written warnings can be issued up to three times.[16]
  • Respondents must implement improvement orders in accordance with the stipulated period. The maximum period for the implementation of written warnings is 30 days, which can be extended based on approvals that are granted at KPPU meetings.[17]
Written warnings could be issued up to three times. Each warning was required to be implemented within 14 business days at the maximum.[18]
Advanced examination
  • If a third written warning is not implemented (either partially or in its entirety), then an advanced examination will ultimately be carried out.[19]
  • The corresponding KPPU assembly session (sidang majelis) and discussion session (musyawarah) will be held within a maximum of 30 business days.[20]
  • If a third written warning was not implemented (either partially or in its entirety), then this stage was ultimately implemented.[21]
  • The corresponding KPPU assembly sessions were to be held within a maximum of 30 business days.[22]
KPPU decision
  • The rendering (pembacaan) of a decision should be completed within a maximum of 30 business days after the completion of the relevant KPPU assembly session for the advanced examination.[23]
  • The decision will be sent to the respondents or their legal representatives within 14 days of its rendering. The respondents must then implement the decision within 30 business days of their receiving it.[24]

Source: hukumonline.com

Analisa Lainnya

KADIN INDONESIA

Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry